Home >>
content-2 >>
Online Detection of Micro-Cracks in Microcrystalline Glass Phone Back Covers Using AI Vision Algorithms: Setting the Threshold for 355 nm UV Laser Marking
Online Detection of Micro-Cracks in Microcrystalline Glass Phone Back Covers Using AI Vision Algorithms: Setting the Threshold for 355 nm UV Laser Marking
Abstract:
The integration of microcrystalline glass in smartphone back covers has become increasingly popular due to its aesthetic appeal and durability. The use of a 355 nm UV laser marking machine for precision engraving on these surfaces presents unique challenges, particularly in ensuring the quality and longevity of the markings. This article discusses the implementation of AI vision algorithms for the online detection of micro-cracks post-laser marking, focusing on the critical aspect of threshold setting to maintain accuracy and efficiency in the process.
Introduction:
Microcrystalline glass, known for its high strength and optical clarity, is a preferred material for smartphone back covers. The 355 nm UV laser marking machine is utilized to etch intricate designs and logos onto the glass surface. However, the process can induce micro-cracks that may affect the structural integrity and appearance of the glass. To address this, an AI-driven vision inspection system is employed to detect and quantify micro-cracks in real-time. The success of this system hinges on the proper setting of detection thresholds.
AI Vision Algorithm and Threshold Setting:
The AI vision algorithm is designed to differentiate between the laser-marked areas and any micro-cracks that may form. The algorithm uses machine learning to recognize patterns and anomalies based on a trained dataset of images. The threshold setting is a critical parameter that determines the sensitivity of the detection system.
1. Image Acquisition:
High-resolution images of the laser-marked microcrystalline glass are captured using a high-speed camera integrated into the production line. These images serve as the input for the AI vision algorithm.
2. Pre-processing:
The images undergo pre-processing to enhance the contrast and clarity of the laser-marked areas and potential micro-cracks. This step is crucial for improving the accuracy of the subsequent analysis.
3. Feature Extraction:
The AI algorithm extracts features from the pre-processed images, focusing on the edges and textures that are indicative of micro-cracks. The extraction process is fine-tuned based on the specific characteristics of the microcrystalline glass and the marking process.
4. Threshold Determination:
The threshold value is set to distinguish between the laser marking and micro-cracks. This involves a balance between sensitivity (the ability to detect small cracks) and specificity (the ability to avoid false positives). The threshold is determined through a series of tests and adjustments, taking into account the variations in laser energy, scanning speed, and glass properties.
5. Crack Detection and Analysis:
Once the threshold is set, the AI algorithm scans the images for micro-cracks. Any detected cracks are analyzed for size, depth, and distribution, providing valuable data for quality control and process optimization.
6. Feedback Loop:
The detection results are fed back into the system to adjust the laser marking parameters in real-time. This closed-loop control helps to minimize the occurrence of micro-cracks and maintain the high quality of the laser-marked glass.
Conclusion:
The online detection of micro-cracks in microcrystalline glass phone back covers using a 355 nm UV laser marking machine is enhanced through the implementation of AI vision algorithms. The key to this system's effectiveness lies in the careful setting of detection thresholds, which ensures accurate and efficient identification of micro-cracks. By integrating such a system into the production line, manufacturers can improve the reliability and aesthetic appeal of their products, while also reducing waste and rework costs.
Keywords: Microcrystalline Glass, Smartphone Back Covers, 355 nm UV Laser Marking, AI Vision Algorithms, Micro-Cracks Detection, Threshold Setting.
.
.
Previous page: Visual Alignment Accuracy of UV Laser Marking and Screen Printing on Microcrystalline Glass Phone Back Covers Next page: Energy Consumption Analysis of 355 nm UV Laser Marking on Microcrystalline Glass Phone Back Covers
Understanding the Cause of Color Removal by Alcohol Wipe After Laser Marking Copper with a Laser Marking Machine
Understanding the "Pop" Sound in Laser Marking Processes
Will 18K Rose Gold Discolor After Laser Marking?
Can Fiber Laser Marking Machines Operate in High-Temperature Workshops?
Selecting the Right Laser Marking Machine for Micro-Cracking Detection with 355 nm Wavelength and Confocal Real-Time Depth Measurement
Laser Marking in Jewelry: Achieving Colorful Oxidation Marks with a Laser Marking Machine
The Application of Telecentric Lenses in ABS Curved Surface Laser Marking
Optimal Scanning Speed for Laser Marking Stainless Steel: The Impact of 2000 mm/s
How Often to Replace Laser Marking Machine Filters
Impact of Hatch Spacing on QR Code Readability in ABS Material Laser Marking
Related Article
Online Detection of Micro-Cracks in Microcrystalline Glass Phone Back Covers Using AI Vision Algorithms: Setting the Threshold for 355 nm UV Laser Marking
Energy Consumption Analysis of 355 nm UV Laser Marking on Microcrystalline Glass Phone Back Covers
Ensuring Drop Resistance of Crystal Glass Phone Backs After 355 nm UV Laser Marking
UV Laser Marking of Microcrystalline Glass Phone Back Covers and 5G Antenna Signal Interference Assessment
Maintaining Channel Wall Roughness Below 100 nm in Borosilicate Glass Microfluidic Chips with 1030 nm Femtosecond Laser Marking
Achieving a 10:1 Aspect Ratio in 3D Reservoir Chambers of Borosilicate Glass Microfluidic Chips Using 1030 nm Femtosecond Laser Marking
Minimizing Fluorescence Background in PCR Experiments Post-Femtosecond Laser Marking of Borosilicate Glass Microfluidic Chips
Minimizing Valve Membrane Damage in Borosilicate Glass Microfluidic Chips with 1030 nm Femtosecond Laser Marking
Compatibility Testing of 1030 nm Femtosecond Laser Marking with Post-etching HF Process on Borosilicate Glass Microfluidic Chips
Compatibility of 1030 nm Femtosecond Laser Marking with Post-Etching Processes on Borosilicate Glass Microfluidic Chips
Measuring Hydrophilicity Changes on Borosilicate Glass Microfluidic Chips After 1030 nm Femtosecond Laser Marking